United States v. Paul Jerome Spiers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEWIS, Circuit Judge.
This appeal calls upon us to clarify our recent holding in United States v. Holifield, 53 F.3d 11 (3d Cir.1995), in which we addressed the question of a district court’s discretion to impose a concurrent or consecutive sentence under section 5G1.3(c) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In Holifield, we held that “although the district court must calculate the ‘reasonable incremental punishment’ according to the [sentencing guidelines’] methodology, it need not impose that penalty.” Id. at 16-17. Today, we reaffirm that a district court must determine the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Harlan Brent GullicksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- United States v. SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Wilner SaintvilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Eric L. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Neil Oser, A/K/A "Lou" Neil OserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.