Legal Opinion

United States v. Paul Jerome Spiers

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 2, 1996No. 95-5335 and 95-5336PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal calls upon us to clarify our recent holding in United States v. Holifield, 53 F.3d 11 (3d Cir.1995), in which we addressed the question of a district court’s discretion to impose a concurrent or consecutive sentence under section 5G1.3(c) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. In Holifield, we held that “although the district court must calculate the ‘reasonable incremental punishment’ according to the [sentencing guidelines’] methodology, it need not impose that penalty.” Id. at 16-17. Today, we reaffirm that a district court must determine the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lankford v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. Harlan Brent GullicksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. United States v. SimmondsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Wilner SaintvilleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Eric L. SwanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Neil Oser, A/K/A "Lou" Neil OserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API