Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Madding

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 2002No. 74,082PublishedCited by 404 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · CochranCochran, J.

in which MEYERS, WOMACK, JOHNSON, HERVEY, and HOLCOMB, JJ., joined.

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.1 Applicant was convicted of burglary of a building and sentenced to seventeen years imprisonment. Applicant has filed a pro se subsequent writ of habe-as corpus. He claims a constitutional double jeopardy violation because the trial court initially ruled that his sentence would be served concurrently with another case from Gregg County, but the judgment, signed 52 days later,…

3Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Ex Parte LemkeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. United States v. BenzSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by404 opinions

  1. Johnson, Manley DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  3. Weir v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Ex Parte HuskinsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

399 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API