Legal Opinion
United States v. Harlan Brent Gullickson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1992No. 92-1398PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Harlan Brent Gullickson appeals the district court’s order, requiring his 121-month federal sentence to run consecutively to previously imposed and unexpired state sentences. Gullickson argues that the district court erred by refusing to order his federal sentence to run concurrently with his state sentences in accordance with U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(c) (Nov.1991). We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
On December 10, 1990, Gullickson pleaded guilty in South Dakota state court to passing a forged instrument. The court suspended…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa AnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Horst Werner Joetzki, United States of America v. Lawrence Carl GisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robin F. WillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Gwendolyn FossettCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ricky Lee HascallCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Michael D. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Van ThournoutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant/appellee v. Ivy Nelson Fountain, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.