Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. North Pacific Insurance
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION THE COURT’S PRIOR OPINION DATED 06/23/95 IS HEREBY WITHDRAWN
SILAK, Justice.
This is an insurance coverage dispute. Losses from an auto collision were covered by two auto insurance policies, both of which contained “other insurance” clauses. The two companies that issued the policies contend the “other insurance” clause in their own, but not the other company’s policy, should be enforced, and that the other company’s policy should be considered the primary insurance.
I
BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE
Kacey Pulley (Pulley) rented an automobile from Rick’s Car Store, Inc., d/b/a U-Save…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Olsen v. J.A. Freeman Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1990
- Harris v. State, Dept. of HealthIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Brinkman v. Aid Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
- May Trucking Co. v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Smith v. MittonIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Lee v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Perkins v. U.S. Transformer WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- American Casualty Co. of Reading v. Phico InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Elliott v. Darwin Neibaur FarmsIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.