Legal Opinion

McCarley v. Wood Drugs, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 8, 1934No. 6 Div. 369PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

Plaintiff’s cause proceeded to trial upon counts 1 and 4, which, as a basis for recovery, rest upon the negligence of defendant in failing to exercise a proper degree of care in the selection and preparation of the food served to her in defendant’s place of business. Such degree of care has been here defined as follows: “The law requires that, in the selection of the food for his restaurant and in cooking it for his customers, he shall exercise that same degree of care which a reasonably prudent man, skilled in the art of selecting and preparing food for human consumption,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Sheffer v. WilloughbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  5. George's Restaurant v. DukesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  4. Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and GrocerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Childs Dining Hall Co. v. SwinglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API