McCarley v. Wood Drugs, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
Plaintiff’s cause proceeded to trial upon counts 1 and 4, which, as a basis for recovery, rest upon the negligence of defendant in failing to exercise a proper degree of care in the selection and preparation of the food served to her in defendant’s place of business. Such degree of care has been here defined as follows: “The law requires that, in the selection of the food for his restaurant and in cooking it for his customers, he shall exercise that same degree of care which a reasonably prudent man, skilled in the art of selecting and preparing food for human consumption,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Friend v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
- Lawson v. Mobile Electric Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Sheffer v. WilloughbyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- George's Restaurant v. DukesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Flagstar Enterprises, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
- Kirkland v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Stanfield ex rel. Stanfield v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and GrocerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
- Childs Dining Hall Co. v. SwinglerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.