George's Restaurant v. Dukes
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
. BOULDIN, J.
Count 1 of the complaint charges, in substance, that the defendant operated a restaurant where plaintiff purchased some fish sandwiches; that defendant, or his employee while acting within the scope of employment, negligently sold and served fish that was tainted, decayed, and infected with maggots; that plaintiff, before discov-. ering its decayed or infected condition, did eat a part of such fish, and as a proximate result was made violently sick, etc., to his damage.
This count sufficiently shows the causal connection of the negligence charged and plaintiff’s injury. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- International Agri. Cor. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Mobile & O. R. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.