Legal Opinion

George's Restaurant v. Dukes

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1927No. 6 Div. 865PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

. BOULDIN, J.

Count 1 of the complaint charges, in substance, that the defendant operated a restaurant where plaintiff purchased some fish sandwiches; that defendant, or his employee while acting within the scope of employment, negligently sold and served fish that was tainted, decayed, and infected with maggots; that plaintiff, before discov-. ering its decayed or infected condition, did eat a part of such fish, and as a proximate result was made violently sick, etc., to his damage.

This count sufficiently shows the causal connection of the negligence charged and plaintiff’s injury. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Birmingham Ry. Light & Power Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  2. International Agri. Cor. v. AbercrombieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Travis v. L. & N. R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1896
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. City of Dothan v. HardySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Montgomery City Lines, Inc. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Ewart v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Mobile & O. R. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API