Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Moore Brothers Feed and Grocery
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 9, 1958No. 6 Div. 229PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, Justice.
The plaintiff has appealed from a judgment on a jury’s directed verdict for the defendant in a suit for damages for breach of warranty in the sale of livestock feed. The complaint was in two counts, but the defendant’s demurrer to Count Two was sustained, and Count One went to the jury.
Count One is as follows:
“The plaintiff claims of the defendants the sum of Thirty Five Hundred Dollars ($3500.00) damages, for a breach of warranty in the sale of livestock feed known as ‘Snapped Ear Corn’ by defendants to the plaintiff on the 7th day of January, 1955; which the defendants…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Rinaldi v. . Mohican Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Mazer v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Irby v. WildeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
- Dothan Chero-Cola Bottling Co. v. WeeksAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Green v. RALSTON PURNIA COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Blackwell v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Vinyard v. DuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Sams v. Ezy-Way Foodliner Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Pierson v. CaseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.