Legal Opinion
Karzen v. Heitzmann
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 1957No. 7718PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Judge.
The plaintiffs are dealers in pianos with their principal place of business in Chicago, Illinois. The defendant is a retail dealer in furniture, musical instruments and appliances whose place of business is in Ashley, North Dakota. He has been tuning and servicing pianos since 1926 or 1927. In July of 1953 he went to Chicago to buy some pianos and on the 16th of that month went to the place of business of the plaintiffs where he examined their stock of used pianos. He selected and purchased 15 of them. After making this purchase he inquired about Ludwig pianos and the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Scandinavian American Bank of Fargo v. WestbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- International Harvester Co. of America v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Mettlen v. SandozNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Taylor v. NissenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- Rose v. American National Bank of Beaver DamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pear v. Grand Forks Motel AssociatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Butler v. Roberts (In Re Roberts)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1985
- Superwood Corporation, Formerly Superior Wood Products, Inc. v. Larson-Stang, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1963
- Butler v. RobertsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- In re LaberUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1986