Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Nissen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1931No. File No. 6804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoberts, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note. The defendants admitted the execution of the note, but alleged in defense that the note was given with a real estate mortgage and pursuant to an agreement that there would be no personal liability. There was also interposed a counterclaim for damages for breach of contract to paint certain farm buildings. From judgment for defendants and order overruling motion for new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff and defendant W. C. Nissen entered into' an agreement, dated November 15, 1919, to exchange properties. Under the terms of this contract, W. C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Auld v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Black Hills Nat'l Bank v. KelloggSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Miller v. WaySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Andrews v. First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Smith v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Summit Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Janssen v. TushaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Blackpipe State Bank v. GrassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Karzen v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Peter Kiewit Sons' Company v. Summit Construction Company and General Insurance Company of America, Summit Construction Company and General Insurance Company of America v. Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, General Insurance Company of America v. Peter Kiewit Sons' CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API