Legal Opinion

Rose v. American National Bank of Beaver Dam

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

Upon this appeal petitioners contend that, (1) the holders of the first issue of drainage bonds by accepting refunding bonds in lieu thereof did not lose the lien of the first issue in the absence of an express agreement creating a novation; (2) where the taxing power of a drainage district has been exhausted and the district has insufficient funds to pay the existing bonds in full, the fund should be prorated; (3) that under the circumstances of this case the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the trust was repudiated.

Petitioners invoke the doctrine well established in this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. StarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Wisconsin Trust Co. v. CousinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Rosendale State Bank v. HollandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Shaw v. Crandon State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  5. In re Dancy Drainage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Navine v. PeltierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Siva Truck Leasing, Inc. v. Kurman DistributorsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  3. Reichenberger v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Karzen v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API