Legal Opinion

Mettlen v. Sandoz

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1936No. 29710PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Landis, District Judge.

In this suit instituted by Sarah Mettlen as plaintiff, there: was sought foreclosure of the security for certaim indebted*627ness of the defendants George E. Sandoz and Helen Sandoz, his wife.

Defendants interposed the defense of recoupment or reduction against the indebtedness representing the purchase price, based upon representations as to certain water and irrigation rights as appurtenant to the land, which were relied upon and failed.

Plaintiff joins issue and pleads the statute of limitations, estoppel and laches against the claim of recoupment by defendants.

The court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Auld v. WalkerNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Berwyn State Bank v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Davis v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Exeter National Bank v. OrchardNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Kaup v. SchinstockNebraska Supreme Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nathan v. McKernanNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In Re Estate of MassieNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Oft v. DornackerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Karzen v. HeitzmannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Kehr v. BlomenkampNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API