Mosley v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BOEHM, Justice.
In Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the Supreme Court of the United States established a procedure permitting appointed counsel to withdraw from "frivolous" erimi-nal appeals. We decline to adopt the An- ders protocol and hold that in any direct criminal appeal as a matter of right, counsel must submit an advocative brief in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 46.
Facts and Procedural History
Indianapolis Metropolitan Police officers William Flude and Joe Stern responded to a report of an unruly patron at Bubbaz Bar & Grill. After…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Troy Shaw v. Bill WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- State v. WennerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. Cruz-RamosOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.