Legal Opinion

Mosley v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 2009No. 49S02-0812-CR-643PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

In Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), the Supreme Court of the United States established a procedure permitting appointed counsel to withdraw from "frivolous" erimi-nal appeals. We decline to adopt the An- ders protocol and hold that in any direct criminal appeal as a matter of right, counsel must submit an advocative brief in accordance with Indiana Appellate Rule 46.

Facts and Procedural History

Indianapolis Metropolitan Police officers William Flude and Joe Stern responded to a report of an unruly patron at Bubbaz Bar & Grill. After…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Troy Shaw v. Bill WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Hill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. State v. WennerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. State v. Cruz-RamosOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API