Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 2012No. 45S03-1105-PC-283PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID, Justice.

The present case involves several petitions under Indiana’s Post-Conviction Rules. Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 1 permits, among other things, a defendant to file a petition challenging the performance of his trial, appellate, or post-conviction counsel. Indiana Post-Conviction Rule 2 permits, among other things, a defendant to petition the trial court for permission to pursue a belated direct appeal.

Here, the defendant’s counsel filed a Post-Conviction Rule 2 petition, seeking permission to file a belated notice of appeal. The trial court denied permission, and counsel did not…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Baum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Gutermuth v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. David Anthony Jordan v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Derek Core v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Carlos Tacio Ortiz v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2026
  4. Dalvonte Jones v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Daurrell L. Figgs v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API