Legal Opinion
Vogelhut v. Kandel
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 21, 1986No. 501, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KARWACKI, Judge.
This case arises from a dispute between two members of the Maryland Bar. The issues presented concern the validity of an agreement allegedly entered on April 11, 1980 whereby Steven M. Vogelhut, the appellant, promised to pay a portion of any fee he received for the representation of certain personal injury claimants to Nelson R. Kandel. At a bench trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, Judge David Ross resolved those issues in favor of Kandel and rendered judgment in his favor against Vogelhut for $18,700.
The history of this dispute begins on August 5, 1978 when…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Beall v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. Victill Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SemmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1890
- Ashman v. SchecterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McIntireCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KorotkiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Vogelhut v. KandelCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Brussow v. Utah State BarUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- First Union National Bank v. Meyer, Faller, Weisman & Rosenberg, P.C.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Langhoff v. MarrCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.