Vogelhut v. Kandel
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
*186COUCH, Judge.
We shall here hold that where a discharged attorney-gives the files relating to his former client to a successor attorney in exchange for a promise by the successor attorney to give the discharged attorney twenty-five percent of any fee received by the successor attorney, there is an enforceable contract between the attorneys not involving the client. We further hold that such an agreement does not violate either Disciplinary Rule 2-106 or 2-107 of the Code of Professional Responsibility.
The facts of this case are as follows. Shirley Ellis retained the services of attorney Nelson…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Shimp v. ShimpCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Blumenthal v. HeronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Taylor v. TurleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
- Vogelhut v. KandelCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Cheek v. United Healthcare of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
- Williams v. StoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Holloman v. Circuit City Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- County Commissioners for Carroll County v. Forty West Builders, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.