Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McIntire

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 18, 1979No. [Misc. Docket (Subtitle BV) No. 29, September Term, 1978.]PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, C. J.

Digges, Eldridge and Cole, JJ., dissent and Eldridge, J., filed a dissenting opinion in which Digges and Cole, JJ., concur at page 96 infra.

The Attorney Grievance Commission, through Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action, pursuant to Maryland Rule BV9, against Theodore Bryan Mclntire, Jr., alleging violations of Disciplinary Rule 9-102 (A) (1) and (2) and (B) (3) and (4), which provides:

“DR 9-102 Preserving Identity of Funds and Property of a Client.
“(A) All funds of clients paid to a lawyer or law firm, other than advances for costs and expenses, shall be deposited in one or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Laurel Race Course, Inc. v. Regal Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Silver v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FlynnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Ashman v. SchecterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Sevin v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cochran v. NorkunasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SheridanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  3. Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. Mass Transit Administration v. Granite Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. FLF, INC. v. World Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1998

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API