Brussow v. Utah State Bar
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
{11 Attorney Franklin Brussow appeals from the decision of the Utah State Bar Ethics and Discipline Committee (Committee) to sanction him by public reprimand for violating rules 1.15(d) and 1.16(d) of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct.1 After conducting a hearing, a screening panel of the Ethics and Discipline Committee (Screening Panel) concluded that Mr. Brussow had violated these rules and recommended that he be publicly reprimanded. Mr. Brussow filed an exception and requested a hearing to challenge the Sereening Panel's conclusion. After holding a hearing, the Chair of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patterson v. PattersonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. RothlisbergerUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of Discipline of InceUtah Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Utah State Bar v. JardineUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Rose v. Office of Prof'l ConductUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Discipline of Donald GilbertUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Bohman Aggregates v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2021
- Disciplinary Counsel v. GrendellOhio Supreme Court · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.