Huffaker v. Donnelly
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The appeal of Huffaker is from the decree of distribution.
The will of the decedent directed the sale of a certain lot and the payment of one-half of the net proceeds thereof to one A. W. Gamble. Huffaker claims this one-half interest as assignee of said Gamble. By the decree appealed from this half was adjudged to be the sum of $819.11, and the further direction was made that there be deducted therefrom the sum of $458.60, the amount of two certain judgments in favor of the estate against said Gamble, rendered prior to the asserted transfer to Huffaker, and that the balance of $360.51 be dis…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Estate of HoweCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Totten v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Culbert v. LindvallWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Knoch v. HaizlipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by17 opinions
- Church v. QuinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re Estate of HubbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Waymire v. California Trona Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Arnold v. San Ramon Valley BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- In Re Estate of ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.