Legal Opinion

Culbert v. Lindvall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1913No. 10563PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Black, J., entered October 14, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to foreclose a mechanics’ lien.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was instituted for the purpose of foreclosing a lien for labor.

Sometime during the summer of the year 1910, the defendants Lindvall and wife entered into a contract with the Kimm Company, a corporation, for the erection of a dwelling house upon a lot then owned by them, described as follows, to wit: Lot 6, block 42, “B” addition to Whitehouse Heights addition to Spokane, Spokane county, state of Washington. Thereafter, the Kimm Company contracted with the Springston Lumber Company, a corporation, for lumber for the building, the contract price being $695. The Kimm Company…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spokane Grain & Fuel Co. v. LyttakerWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Hallett v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Architectural Decorating Co. v. NicklasonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Heim v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Robinson Manufacturing Co. v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. Yakima Valley Canal Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Huffaker v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hayes v. GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Robinson Tile & Marble Co. v. SamuelsWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Velazquez Framing, LLC v. Cascadia Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API