Legal Opinion

R.M. Bennett Heirs v. Ontario Iron Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 9, 1988No. C9-88-676PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

In July 1978 the parties 1 entered into a mining lease containing a specific and man datory arbitration provision governing disagreements over the terms of the lease. On October 29, 1987, respondents sued appellants claiming past improper calculation of royalties owed them under the lease. Appellants served a demand for arbitration and moved to stay the court proceeding pending arbitration of the dispute. The trial court denied appellants’ motion and held the arbitration provision inapplicable to the issue in dispute, which is the amount of money owed lessors by lessees.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. BerthiaumeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Har-Mar, Incorporated v. Thorsen & Thorshov, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Niazi v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. County of Hennepin v. Ada-Bec SystemsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arbitration Demand of 200 Levee Drive Associates, Ltd. v. Bor-Son Building Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Independent School District No. 775 v. Holm Bros. Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  4. Michael-Curry Companies v. Knutson Shareholders Liquidating TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API