Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. Brafford

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1896No. 1,758PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, C. J.

The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the general verdict in favor of appellee is properly presented for our determination.

There is evidence to support the following state of facts:

At the time of the accident, upon August 27, 1893, appellant’s railroad ran through Frankfort, a city of 8,000 people, along Ohio street, a public highway, passing through the central portion of the city. Appellee’s decedent, who was a deaf mute, twenty-four years old, entered upon the track early Sunday morning, and walked thereon some distance west until at a point, about seventy feet east of Jackson street…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BryanIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Pennsylvania Co. v. StegemeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Columbus & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. HarringtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McKeown v. CalusaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Central Indiana Railway Co. v. WishardIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Gunter's Adm'r v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  4. Abelman v. HaehnelIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API