Legal Opinion
McKeown v. Calusa
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 27, 1977No. 3-974A164PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrard, J.
McKeown brought suit for injuries received in an automobile collision. The court granted judgment on the evidence, Indiana Rules of Procedure, Trial Rule 50, against McKeown upon his count charging wilful and wanton misconduct by Calusa, the driver of the other vehicle. The jury returned a verdict for the defendants upon the count asserting negligence.
On appeal McKeown asserts judgment on the evidence was improperly granted regarding his claim of wilful and wanton *3misconduct, and that the court erred in refusing a requested instruction regarding wilful and wanton misconduct. Secondly, he…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Miller v. GrieselIndiana Supreme Court · 1974
- Vernon Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. v. SharpIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Mamula v. Ford Motor CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Palmer v. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Boyle v. Anderson Fire Fighters Ass'n Local 1262Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Witham v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Senco Products, Inc. v. RileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Robbins v. McCarthyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.