Legal Opinion

In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York

Decided January 22, 1987No. 19-10184PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HOWARD C. BUSCHMAN, III, Bankruptcy Judge.

On this motion for a preliminary injunction, we are given the unenviable task of construing statutory language containing material inconsistencies that are not directly addressed by the legislative history. Prudential Lines, Inc. (“PLI” or the “Debt- or”), the debtor-in-possession in this proceeding under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”), 11 U.S.C. § 1101 et seq. (1986), and Union Minerals and Alloys Corp. (“UMAC”), a petitioning creditor, seek a preliminary injunction enjoining the United States Maritime Administration…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1936

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Prudential Lines, Inc. v. United States Maritime Administration (In Re Prudential Lines, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
  3. Batt v. American Rent-All (In Re Batt)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
  4. In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert Group Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  5. In Re McLean Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API