Legal Opinion
Duparquet Huot & Moneuse Co. v. Evans
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 3, 1936No. 533PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cardozo
The question is whether a receivership for the collection of rents and profits in a suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage is an “equity receivership” within the meaning of § 77B of the Bankruptcy Act providing for the reorganization of debtor corporations in involuntary proceedings.
In 1934 and afterwards, “2168 Broadway Corporation” was the owner of a large hotel in the City of New York. and of the fixtures and furniture contained therein. It had no other property. The holder of a mortgage on the hotel began an action of foreclosure and procured the appointment of receivers to collect the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Metcalf v. BarkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Straton v. NewSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois Ex Rel. Gordon v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Forty-One Thirty-Six Wilcox Bldg. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.