Legal Opinion

Smith v. Squires Timber Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 5, 1993No. 23829PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Chief Justice:

This is a workers’ compensation case. We granted certiorari to review Smith v. Squires Timber Co., — S.C. —, 417 S.E. (2d) 101 (Ct. App. 1992), wherein the Court of Appeals found that the Workers’ Compensation Commission (Commission) failed to rule on the question whether respondent Jeanette D. Smith’s husband, James Albert Smith (Smith), an independent contractor, was a statutory employee of Randy Brown Logging (Brown). The Court of Appeals remanded the case to the Commission to make a finding regarding this issue. Petitioners contend that remand was improper. We agree…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  2. McDowell v. Stilley Plywood Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Smith v. T.H. Snipes & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Marlow v. E. L. Jones & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  5. Gore v. SkipperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Etheredge v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
  3. Lockridge v. Santens of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Neese v. Michelin Tire Corp.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  5. Lee v. Harborside CaféCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API