Legal Opinion

Cabral v. McBryde Sugar Co., Ltd.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1982No. 8129PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, C.J.

The Cabrals sued McBryde, alleging that their property was damaged by the overflow of McBryde’s negligently maintained irrigation flume. The jury found the Cabrals more negligent than McBryde, and judgment was filed in favor of McBryde.

On appeal the Cabrals raise two issues:

I. McBryde is strictly liable for damages suffered by the Cabrals’ property.

II. The lower court reversibly erred in denying the Cabrals’ Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Special Verdict to Enter Judgment as Supported by Affidavits Herein or for a New Trial.

We affirm the lower…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Turner v. WillisHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. McKenna v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Struzik v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kamaka v. Goodsill Anderson Quinn & StifelHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hong v. KongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Bank of Honolulu, NA v. AndersonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re the Determination & Declaration of the Heirs of KeamoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API