Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEVINSON, J.
The plaintiffs-appellants Joseph and Gail Birmingham (the Birminghams) appeal orders entered March 13, 1991, June 4, 1991, and June 10, 1991, granting summary judgment on their negligence claims in favor of the defendants-appellees Fodor’s Travel Publications, Inc. (Fodor’s), State of Hawaii (State), and County of Kauai (County). On the record before us, we answer the following question: Did Fodor’s, the State and/or the County owe the Birminghams a duty to warn of ocean surf conditions? For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we answer in the negative as…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Pickard v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Fujioka Ex Rel. Fujioka v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
- Stewart v. Budget Rent-A-Car CorporationHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Ono v. ApplegateHawaii Supreme Court · 1980
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri ProductsHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Blair v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
- Konno v. County of Hawai'iHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
- Mr. & Mrs. Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.