Legal Opinion

Bank of Honolulu, NA v. Anderson

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1982No. 8399PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TANAKA, J.

In this action, plaintiff Bank of Honolulu, N.A. (the Bank) sought to cancel or, in the alternative, to foreclose on an agreement of sale of real property entered into with defendant Lilly C. Anderson (Anderson). Anderson appealed from the order granting the Bank’s modon for. summary judgment and the decree foreclosing her interest in the agreement of sale. The Bank cross-appealed. We affirm.

The issues on appeal are:

1. Whether the decree of foreclosure is void for uncertainty.

2. Whether the court erred in granting the Bank’s motion for summary judgment.

3.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jenkins v. WiseHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Kawamoto v. YasutakeHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Technicolor, Inc. v. TraegerHawaii Supreme Court · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hong v. KongHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McCarthy v. YempukuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Wohlschlegel v. Uhlmann-Kihei, Inc.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Bank of America, N.A. v. Reyes-Toledo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Kainz v. LussierHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API