Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Ins. v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 1967No. 5-4052PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Paul Ward, Justice.

A complaint was filed by Attorney Paul K. Eoberts (appellee, represented by another attorney) to collect a fee from the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (appellant) based on legal services rendered in an attempt to collect on an insurance policy written by appellant in which his client was the beneficiary.

A jury trial resulted in a judgment in favor of appellee for $1,000, and this appeal follows.

Facts. The basic background facts, about which there is no dispute, are as follows. On November 1, 1950 appellant issued its policy to George 0. Henley undertaking to pay, at…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hays & WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Slayton v. RussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. McNeilSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1936
  4. Whetstone v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  5. Whetstone v. TravisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. MacK v. Brazil, Adlong & Winningham, PLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Myers v. MuussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Home Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. Eubanks v. Black & White Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API