Whetstone v. Daniel
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.
This case went off below on demurrer to the complaint. The plaintiff, a lawyer, alleged in his complaint that he had been employed by a Texas finance company to collect a balance of $226.12 from the defendant or to repossess the car on which this debt was owed. Upon being so employed the plaintiff called on the defendant and obtained a promise that the defendant would on the following day either pay the debt or surrender the car. In disregard of his promise the defendant made a direct settlement with the finance company, after which the latter offered to pay the plaintiff a nominal fee for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Slayton v. RussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
3Cited by6 opinions
- MacK v. Brazil, Adlong & Winningham, PLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Metropolitan Life Ins. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Mohawk Rubber Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
- Home Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Eubanks v. Black & White Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.