Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

MacK v. Brazil, Adlong & Winningham, PLC

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 15, 2004No. 03-900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Chief Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute tice. appellants, Junita Mack and Frederick Goss, and the appellee law firm of Brazil, Adlong & Winningham, P.L.C. Ms. Mack signed a contingency-fee contract with the Brazil law firm to represent her in a personal injury suit. After discharging the law firm without cause, Ms. Mack hired Frederick Goss as her new attorney. The law firm attempted to perfect an attorney’s lien against any settlement or judgment obtained by Ms. Mack in her lawsuit. When Ms. Mack and Mr. Goss settled the lawsuit with the tortfeasors for $100,000.00,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ford v. KeithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Hodges v. HuckabeeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Burcham v. City of Van BurenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Stephens v. Arkansas School for the BlindSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Kildow v. Baldwin Piano & OrganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dodson v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Weiss v. American Honda Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  3. Daimlerchrysler Services North America, LLC v. WeissSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Morgan v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. Clinical Study Centers, Inc. v. BoellnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API