Legal Opinion

Myers v. Muuss

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1984No. 83-195PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steele Hays, Justice.

Appellant, William George Myers, practices law in Fayetteville. In September 1981, he was retained by appellee, Berta Muuss, who claimed to be due an accounting for property entrusted to her daughter and son-in-law, appellees Davis and Bisela Beiler, who were contestants in a divorce suit. Myers was authorized to file suit for an accounting by the Beilers and to assist Mrs. Beiler’s lawyer in the approaching trial of the divorce suit. He was to be paid $60.00 per hour and out-of-pocket expenses. He promptly filed suit for an accounting and actively assisted in preparation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Beene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1860
  2. Hurst v. Bar Rules Committee of the State of Ark.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  3. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Hays & WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Slayton v. RussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  5. Commonwealth Public Service Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Henry, Walden & Davis v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. Harris v. Stephens Production Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  3. Hyde v. CM Vending Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Lou v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API