Lisowski v. Hastings Mutual Insurance

¶ 1. This is a review of an unpublished court of appeals per curiam opinion1 that affirmed a circuit court decision dismissing a claim by Jonathan Lisowski against Hastings Mutual Insurance Company for underinsured motorists coverage under Lisowski's father's business auto policy.

¶ 2. The "for a covered auto" language on which this case turns is substantive language that appears in several places in the policy, including the endorsement *392page. When the provisions of the policy are read together, the language is not ambiguous. We agree with the reasoning of Crandall v. Society Insurance, 2004…