Legal Opinion

Gridley v. Fellows

California Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1914No. S.F. No. 6647PublishedCited by 18 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff appeals from an order granting the motion of the defendant to change the place of trial from Fresno County to Los Angeles County.

The action was to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused to the person of the plaintiff by reason of certain alleged negligence of the defendant. The injury occurred in Fresno County. The defendant, at the time the action was begun, resided in Los Angeles County and has resided there ever since that date. The motion to change the place of trial was based solely on the fact of the defendant’s residence in Los Angeles County, and upon…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Cullen v. Glendora Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Monk v. EhretCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Medical Marijuana, Inc. v. HornSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
  5. Mansfield v. Pickwick StagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API