Legal Opinion

Mansfield v. Pickwick Stages

California Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1923No. S. F. No. 10578. S. F. No. 10576. S. F. No. 10577. S. F. No. 10575PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

The defendant in each of the above-entitled actions prosecutes these appeals from orders. denying its motion for a change of venue from Monterey County to Los Angeles County. Each action is for damages for personal injuries sustained in an accident which occurred in Monterey County. The defendant, a corporation, had its principal place of business, and therefore its legal residence, in Los Angeles County. Prior to the commencement of these actions in Monterey County each of the plaintiffs filed a complaint upon the same cause of action in the city and county of San Francisco, whereupon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Herdan v. HansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Buckmaster v. BertramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. McGibbon v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Hines v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Wallis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Campanella v. CampanellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Schumm v. BergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Roam v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API