Betten Co. v. Brauman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.
Defendant assigns as error that the court erred in finding and concluding, (1) that some of the businesses, which plaintiffs contend are enumerated in the restrictive clauses of certain contracts and a bill of sale, were businesses in which the parties had engaged prior to the sale of defendant’s stock in the plaintiff corporation to the plaintiff, Daniel Betten; (2) that the good will of that corporation extended one hundred miles from the city of Green Bay at the date of the sale; (3) that the restrictions were reasonably necessary for the protection of the good will of the corporation and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Up River Ice Co. v. DenlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- Milwaukee Linen Supply Co. v. RingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- General Bronze Corp. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Kradwell v. ThiesenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Durbrow Commission Co. v. DonnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Aviation Associates, Inc. v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1990
- Brunswick Corp., Mercury Marine Division v. HeringMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Mark McNally v. Capital Cartage, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018