Legal Opinion
Up River Ice Co. v. Denler
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 14, 1897PublishedCited by 28 opinions
Appeal from St. Clair; Vance, J. Bill by tbe Up River Ice Company to enjoin George Denler and Alice Denler from carrying on an ice business at Port Huron. Prom a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.
The complainant is a corporation doing an ice business at Port Huron. On June 26, 1889, defendant George Denler owned 140 shares of its capital stock, of the face value of $3,500. He was the general manager of the company. On that day he sold out all of his interest to Albert D. Bennett under the following contract :
*298“This agreement, made and entered into between George Denier, of the first part, and Albert D. Bennett, of the second part, Witnesseth:
“In consideration of the purchase made this day by the party of the second part of stock to the amount of $3,500 in the Up River Ice Company, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hubbard v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Beal v. ChaseMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Thompson v. AndrusMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bloom v. Home Insurance AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
- Hedrick v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Ryan v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
- Wawak Co. v. KaiserCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.