Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Linen Supply Co. v. Ring

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1933PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The contract in suit is one in restraint of trade which is tersely defined as one whose “performance would limit competition in any business or restrict a prom-isor in the exercise of a gainful occupation.” Such a contract “is illegal if the restraint is unreasonable,” and such a contract “is unreasonable . . .if. . . it (a) is greater than is required for the protection of the person for whose benefit the restraint is imposed, or (b) imposes undue hardship upon the person restricted.” Restatement of the Law of Contracts, secs. 513, 514, 515. It will be observed that the findings of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Eureka Laundry Co. v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Reiman Associates, Inc. v. R/A Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
  2. Kadis v. . BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Arthur Murray Dance Studios of Cleveland, Inc. v. WitterCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  4. Donahue v. Permacel Tape Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Rollins Burdick Hunter of Wisconsin, Inc. v. HamiltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API