Legal Opinion

General Bronze Corp. v. Schmeling

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Prior to July 25, 1929, the defendants W. C. Schmeling, F. Van Kooy, and Arthur R. Stark were stockholders and employees of the Wisconsin Ornamental Iron & Bronze Company. Each of the defendants on that date owned fifty-five shares out of a total of 981 shares of this company. Schmeling was the assistant general manager and superintendent of production and erection; Van Kooy was vice-president and chief draftsman, and Stark was treasurer and purchasing agent.

Sometime prior to June 28, 1929, negotiations were commenced between the plaintiff and Mr. E. A. Ernest, president of the Wisconsin…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Diamond Match Co. v. . RoeberNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Lindemann v. RuskWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
  4. Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. My Laundry Co. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Karpinski v. IngrasciNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Streiff v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Star Direct, Inc. v. Dal PraWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API