Legal Opinion

Griffiths v. Andy's Body & Frame, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2007No. S-12252PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Robert Griffiths worked as an auto body repairman before developing hand and wrist symptoms that made it difficult for him to work. He filed an injury report and workers' compensation claim for carpal tunnel syndrome in 2001 and had surgery on both hands. Griffiths applied and was initially found eligible for reemployment benefits, but his employer later petitioned to modify this eligibility determination. After a hearing, the board ruled that Griffiths was no longer eligible for benefits because his employer's medical examiner had found no permanent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Rose v. Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rydwell v. Anchorage School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hodges v. Alaska Constructors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Ray v. RayAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alaska Community Action on Toxics v. HartigAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Burke v. Raven Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Alaska Exchange Carriers Association, Inc. v. Regulatory Com'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Sosa de Rosario v. Chenega LodgingAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Pacifica Marine, Inc. v. Solomon Gold, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API