Legal Opinion

Ex Parte De Bardeleben Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1925No. 6 Div. 180PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

Petition for writ of certiorari to review the judgment of the circuit court, awarding compensation to one Charlie York for personal injuries sustained in the coal mine of petitioner De Bardeleben Coal Company. York, a youth, 16 years of age, was employed in said mine as a “pumper” ¿t night, beginning at 6:30 p. m. and being relieved from duty at 5 o’clock the next morning. There were in the mines 13 different points from which the water had to be pumped “consisting of 9 sumps and 4 rooms.” The pump served each of these “sumps” and rooms by means of a valve, but only one valve could be…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  4. Ex Parte Majestic Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. Ex Parte ShawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Agricola Furnace Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  2. Exchange Distributing Co. v. OslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Summit Coal Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API