Ex Parte Shaw
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a proceeding by certiorari to review the award of the circuit court in the matter of the petition of Will Shaw for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1919, p. 206). Shaw, to whom we will refer as plaintiff, complained of an injury resulting from an accident in which creosote was splashed into his eyes, causing temporary total and permanent partial loss of vision. The trial court found that plaintiff's right eye was 50 per cent. deficient when he entered into the service of defendant, the T. C. I. Company; that both eyes are "now 50 to 85 per cent. deficient…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woodward Iron Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Greek v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ex Parte Louisville N. R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Zinken v. Melrose Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
3Cited by27 opinions
- Alabama Textile Products Corporation v. GranthamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Ex Parte ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Baughn v. Little Cahaba Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Bass v. Cowikee MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.