Magee v. Litchfield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Washington County; R. H. Hudson, Judge. Consol'dated actions by R. S. Litchfield and others against Lola Magee. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
ROBBERTS, C.
This case involves garnishment proceeding only, and thereby the ownership of certain funds. The facts are in substance as follows:
On the 7th day of February, 1912, the Frick-Eeid Supply Company, one of the defendants in error herein, obtained a personal judgment in the district court of Washington county against S. G. Magee for the sum of $1,321.50, and thereafter execution was duly issued on said judgment and returned “No goods found.” On the 19th day of August, 1912, E. S. Litchfield, also a defendant in .error herein, commenced an action in the same court against said…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Comrs. of Washita Co. v. HubbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Board of Commissioners v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
- Carson v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Exendine v. GoldstineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- Stevens v. CarsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Murray v. BristowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oriental Cement Plaster Co. v. Roman Nose Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915