Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Carson

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to the district court for Fillmore county. Tried below before Morris, J. Cases cited by counsel are, in the main, referred to in opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtNormal, J.

The plaintiff in error sued out a writ of replevin in the court below, against the sheriff of Fillmore county, to re-, cover possession of a general stock of goods and merchandise, taken by defendant in error under several writs of attachment issued against Garrett Stevens, her husband; she claiming title to the goods under an alleged bill of sale from her husband to her. She failed to give the replevin' bond to the coroner, required by law, and the suit was prosecuted against the sheriff for the conversion of the property, praying for the restoration of the goods, or judgment for their value.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aultman, Taylor & Co. v. ObermeyerNebraska Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Patrick v. LeachNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Thompson v. LoenigNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Estate of BauerNebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wylie v. CharltonNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Carson v. StevensNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Stall v. JonesNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Brownell & Co. v. StoddardNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API