Legal Opinion

State v. Meikle

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 12, 2013No. AC 34203PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The defendant, Clyde Meikle, returns to this court for the fourth time following his conviction of murder in April of 1998. The self-represented1 defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant *662to Practice Book § 43-22. We conclude that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to consider the motion to correct. Accordingly, we remand the matter to the trial court with direction to render a judgment of dismissal.

The underlying offense occurred on November 1, 1994. Following an argument with the victim, Clifford…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. State v. CasianoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  4. Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. LorinskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. State v. MeikleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. WalkerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  2. State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2015
  3. State v. McGeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. State v. McGeeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API