Legal Opinion
State v. Meikle
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 21, 2000No. AC 20516PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*803 Ojp-inion
FOTI, J.
The defendant, Clyde Meikle, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a.1 On appeal, the defendant contends that the trial court improperly (1) rejected his claim that the state, during jury selection, exercised a peremptory challenge in a racially discriminatoiy manner, (2) permitted certain opinion testimony and (3) denied his motion to strike certain testimony and allowed the state to open its casein-chief to introduce further evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ColonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. FinanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. LoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. MeikleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.