Legal Opinion
Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians v. Lorinsky
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 4, 2009No. AC 29512PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROBINSON, J.
The named defendant, Jay Lorinsky, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiff, the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians (Viejas). On appeal, Lorinsky claims that (1) the court incorrectly concluded that the accidental failure of suit statute, General Statutes § 52-592, permitted Viejas’ case to be filed in state court, (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury’s award of damages and (3) the court improperly denied the defendants’ motions for a mistrial and to set aside the verdict. We disagree, and,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Grimm v. GrimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Baker v. BaningosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
- Cogswell v. American Transit InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Naples v. Keystone Building & Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- AMERICAN DIAMOND EXCHANGE, INC. v. AlpertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Dubaldo Electric, LLC v. Montagno Construction, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Utica Mutual Insurance v. Precision Mechanical Services, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.