Davis v. United States
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rehnquist
We are called upon to determine the effect of Rule 12 (b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on a post-conviction motion for relief which raises for the first time a claim of unconstitutional discrimination in the composition of a grand jury. An indictment was returned in the District Court charging petitioner Davis, a Negro, and two white men with entry into a federally insured bank with intent to commit larceny in violation of 18 U. S. C. §§2 and 2113 (a). Represented by appointed counsel,1 petitioner entered a not-guilty plea at his arraignment and was given 30 days within which…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by523 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
518 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.