Legal Opinion
Bishop v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 11, 2007No. 03-446CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought under the Federal Employees Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 5541 et seq. (2000) (“FEPA”) by numerous current and former employees of the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) seeking compensation for overtime work. There are several hundred plaintiffs involved in this and other similar actions against the BOP. Pending are cross-motions for partial summary judgment with respect to one of ten remaining plaintiffs in this case, Craig Chalmers (“plaintiff’). Plaintiff claims compensation primarily for overtime he worked attending various meetings before and after the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- John Doe, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Carlsen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Aletta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Abrantes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Annette E. Jones Norman Sampsonwayne Randolf Scott, Roland Simmons Hazella Thornhill, Sidney Wallace, Anthony Williams, Michael Yahko, for Themselves and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Lesko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023