Legal Opinion

Abrantes v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 11, 2020No. 19-129Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 19-129C (E-Filed: December 11, 2020) ) JOSEPH ABRANTES, et al., ) Motion to Dismiss; RCFC 12(b)(6); ) Border Patrol Agent Pay Reform Act, Plaintiffs, ) 5 U.S.C. § 5550; Back Pay Act, 5 ) U.S.C. § 5596; Anti-Deficiency Act v. ) (ADA),

31 U.S.C. §§ 1341-42; ) Government Employees Fair THE UNITED STATES, ) Treatment Act of 2019 (GEFTA); Pub. ) L. No. 116-1,

133 Stat. 3

(2019). Defendant. ) ) Gary E. Mason, Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Danielle L. Perry, Alan Lescht, Jack Jarrett, Neil Landeen, Gregory F. Coleman, Lisa A. White, Mark E. Silvey, of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API